I feel that A.I.-generated art should not be considered art. A.I generated art is something that takes little to no effort from humans, whilst being generated by artificial intelligence, artificial being a key word here. It shouldn’t be considered art because art is something that humans use to express themselves. So, where is the human expression within A.I generated art? Sure it can be seen within the prompts given to A.I from humans, but thats simply just a few words put together to form a demand given to a computer to do all the work. For example, photoshop, digital art, digital art manipulation are all still considered art. They are still using human expression, human effort, not entirely made up by A.I at all. While Jason M Allen had good intentions for his A.I product of “Théâtre D’opéra Spatial”, it didn’t have a positive execution, or all around positive reaction from social media. One of the points of A.I is to come off as realistic and human made, but it isn’t. Its deceiving, and artificial. It shouldn’t be considered art because it is missing the human creativity part of it, the human effort. Artist’s concerns about this innovation are not exaggerated. I feel that they have a point, because now, their own art might get diminished because of new technology. Art has existed for ages, its one of the most beautiful things about human ideas and creations. A.I has already begun to take over many human roles in the world today, jobs for example. Artist’s are have talent that should be appreciated, but how will we appreciate it if A.I is doing all the artificial work by itself, to deceive us humans, and take credit for other people’s authentic work.