1. I believe that A.I.-generated art should be considered art. Art is subjective. Art can be anything. Art can be shown by words, images, dancing, singing or just your voice. We use and see A.I art on a daily basis, magazines, instagram post, billboards, ads and even fashion models. These are all forms of “art”. We use A.I to enhance or alter photos. A.I. is a part of us and the art world. If we can describe what we see and feel, A.I is able to generate it into visual art. it reflects your creativity but with just a little help with A.I.

2. I do understand the artists’ frustration and don’t think they’re exaggerating their concerns. A.I has Indeed impacted the job market and artists who are competing, like the artists in the article who participated in the fair and lost to A.I art. Having A.I has made it more accessible for everyone to create art with minimal time, and effort. It is as if there’s no authenticity towards the artwork which makes it lose its value. A.I does use outside imaging to create your idea, some may argue that it’s a form of plagiarism. A.I continues to evolve and will continue to make artists worry about the future of art.