I think Marche meant that AI is no different a tool than any other author might use to write, except in its complexity. He remarked at the machine’s ability to imitate patterns of writing but was underwhelmed with its ability to compose more compelling narratives. Its usefulness, he asserts, lies with artists ability to adapt and expand their skill sets. I personally disagree in that I feel Marche disregards the fact that most tools don’t output a finished product with little to no effort. In my personal opinion the process of creation is apart of the essence of the artwork itself. If you develop an ICBM for the purposes of deploying warheads and use one to destroy an incoming meteor that hasn’t changed the fact that you are responsible for creating a potential doomsday device. It certainly doesn’t preclude you from acknowledging the potential harm that you have introduced into the world.